Sunday, 23 September 2012

Eric and Sye... Only in it for the Money


Eric Hovind and Sye Ten Bruggencate are two of the leading proponents of Presuppositional Apologetics today.

But are they genuine True Christians fighting for the advancement of the truth of their particular brand of religion or are they just in it for the Money.


Endorsed by Ray (Banana Man) Comfort
Do they sincerely believe the religious propaganda they promote or have they hit on a good way to make money from their Blogs, Websites, Podcasts, Affiliate Advertising, TV Shows, DVDs, Guest Appearances, On-Line Stores, and a multi million dollar Merchandising organization?

Eric and his recently acquired side-kick, Sye often use the fallacious argument that you can't know anything unless you know everything (or have an imaginary friend that knows everything). They live in a simplistic binary fantasy world where everything has to be absolute... All or nothing. Everything has to be 100% absolute objective fact or it can have no value whatsoever.

Well, there is one thing I believe to be an absolute objective Fact.... Eric and Sye are not REAL Christians.  That's just a front.  They are in this for the money. And I can demonstrate this using only their own brand of religion.


I'm told by self identified Christians "it's easy to tell who the REAL Christians are".

The real ones are the ones who faithfully follow the words of Jesus Christ. I have met many Christians who behave as though they alone are able to correctly determine the word of God. You probably know the kind of guy I mean. fanatically devout, 100% certain of their own interpretation, unable to even consider that they may be wrong and they're very loud and prolific in their evangelising.

Jesus said:-

  • Matt 7:15. "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravening wolves."
  • Matt. 24:23-24. "Then if any man shall say to you Lo, here is the Christ, or, Here, believe it not. For there shall arise false Christ's and false prophets and shall show great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the very elect".
 In John we read
  • 1John 4:1. "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but prove the spirits, whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world."

These are indeed wise words from the Bible. They're a warning that there are many who tell you they know Christ but will be lying.

So how do I determine if Eric and Sye are false prophets or real Christians?

Many Christians will say that only about 10% of people claiming to be Christians are the real thing. If I just pick any Christian and accept their interpretation of scripture, I have a 90% chance of picking a false prophet who will lead me directly to Hell.

The Bible confirms this when it states:-

  • Matt 7:13. Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide [is] the gate, and broad [is] the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:

As I mentioned, In John, it clearly states that I should not believe all these claims of Christians, I must test them to see which ones are really from God. If I am to be saved, It is imperative that I ascertain which Christians are the real thing. If I am to listen to the Truth then I owe it to myself to hear it from a True Christian and not some Hell bound false Christian who's primary interest is financial gain.

Jesus has made very clear the terrible consequences of following the Serpent and his followers. So it is doubly critical that I weed out the False Prophets.
The Bible says in Matthew 7:22-23 that God will reject these self proclaimed believers who were only in it for themselves.
Wise words again from the Bible.
It is a Biblical fact that many who profess to be Christians will be judged false.

In order to get the authoritative answer about Christianity, there is only one source: Jesus Christ. Not the Pope, Not Billy Graham, Not the Arch Bishop of Canterbury, not Eric Hovind and not your own Priest or Pastor or Vicar. Jesus Christ is THE Authority.

If Christianity is the Truth, then the only way to sift through all the different dogmas, denominations, creeds and doctrines is with the guidance of the founder himself. 

The word of self proclaimed Christians can't be trusted here because we know most of them are FALSE CHRISTIANS.

For my proof that Eric and Sye are false Christians, in it for themselves, a money making scheme, I'll "Presuppose" that Eric and Sye are correct and that the New Testament is true and reliable.

If they don't accept that the New Testament is the inspired word of God, not necessarily the literal inerrant word of God but a collection of scriptures, inspired by God that represent God's requirements, his new covenant to mankind, the instruction book for salvation...... then the proof ends here and I win by default. You can't reject the Truth of the Bible and still claim to be a Christian.

Jesus expects a certain behaviour from people who profess to be his followers. It doesn't matter what denomination you are or what church you go to, you are expected to conform to the will of Christ. If Jesus says you must love him, could you honestly claim to be a true follower of Christ if you actually hated him. Obviously not.

If Jesus says you must repent of your sins if you want to be saved, would it be Ok to ignore this instruction and boast of your sins instead? Would you consider yourself a true follower of Christ if you deliberately and knowingly ignored Christ's instructions... if you were fully aware of his instructions and chose to do the opposite? Obviously not.

Most Christians are just fair weather Christian? They're happy to follow the words of Christ so long as it isn't inconvenient to their lifestyle. They're just interested in the warm comfortable feeling of belonging to a big loving brotherhood of like-minded people, plenty of fellowship, happy-clappy brothers and sisters all congratulating each other on the wonderful knowledge that they're Saved?

Many are all talk, professing their devotion to Christ while being selective about the commitments and sacrifices they're are willing to make. They come up with excuses as to why they don't adhere to the more difficult requirements? They want all the rewards without any of the hard work and commitment?
However...
Some are genuine and actually try to follow the words of Christ as best they can. They strive to follow his example and his instructions no matter how difficult or uncomfortable? They accept his word in it's entirety without question? This is the difficult narrow way of Matt 7:14. This is the path that leads to salvation.

Luckily for us, Jesus also provided clear tests for us to make sure about whom we are dealing with. Jesus did not lay down volumes of specific demands for his followers, but those he did mention can be readily used. For example:

  • Matt. 5:39-42. But I say to you, Do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn the other also; and if anyone wants to sue you and take your coat, give your cloak as well; and if anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
  • Luke 6:30. Give to everyone that asketh thee; and from him that taketh away thy goods ask not again.
  • Luke 6:34-35. If you lend to those from whom you hope to receive, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, to receive as much again. But love your enemies, and do them good, and lend never despairing; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be Sons of the Most High: for he is kind toward the unthankful and evil.

This is the crunch:- I need to see if Eric and Sye really do accept the word of Jesus Christ. talk the talk AND walk the walk as specified in Galatians 5:25 If we live in the spirit, let us also walk in the spirit.


Jesus said in Luke 6:30 "Give to everyone that asketh thee". No provisos or exceptions are stated or implied. In fact Jesus says you must give more than is asked and you must give to the unthankful and the evil.

The wisdom in this one statement is astounding. 

He knows exactly how the recognise his true followers and how to recognise the hypocrits.
Giving to the needy is easy. Everyone likes to do that, it makes them feel better about themselves. It lessens their feelings of guilt, it makes them feel charitable and more virtuous, more pious. It gives them a feeling of higher morality, it makes them look good amongst their peers. But Jesus showed great wisdom... He wanted to see if they would still follow his instructions to 'give' when it didn't feel quite so good.

Would YOU still give if you were giving to people you don't know or don't approve of.
If the giving didn't bring you the same personal pleasure, would you give simply because Jesus instructs you to or would you now try to find excuses not to give.
This was the test set by Jesus to weed out the people who give but only for selfish reasons. However, If someone gives for no other reason than their commitment to the word of Jesus Christ, we have found a REAL Christian.

Someone who professes to be a real Christian but will not "give" as Jesus instructed is a FALSE CHRISTIAN. We already know that you can not deliberately and knowingly reject the words of Christ and call yourself a Christian.

You may buy yourself brownie points and public acclaim by giving to your church or your favorite charity. This is the wide easy path that leads to destruction. 
The narrow path that leads to salvation is difficult and uncomfortable. Only a few will find it. It's a difficult path to follow because you must make a choice between your material possessions and your commitment to Christ.

The vast majority of Christians will always choose their material possessions first, Brownie points second and their commitment to Christ last.
So, I'm asking Eric send me $250,000.

Obviously the False Christians who do not follow the word of Jesus will not send anything contrary Christ's instructions. They will do the opposite of what Jesus says. Jesus says "Give to everyone that asks", I know for a fact that Eric will choose NOT to give, because doing as Jesus says has now started to become a little uncomfortable. Following Jesus is now inconvenient. It interferes with those money making schemes.

If Eric and Sye commit to the word of Christ they may not be able to get that new car or that holiday they've been promising themselves. 
What do you think they'll choose, Money or Jesus Christ?

I know for an absolute fact they'll start to look for scriptures that will excuse them from having to do as Jesus says. 
They will quote the writings of John and Paul even though they say Jesus is the ultimate authority. 

They'll quote passages where Jesus says you also have to give to other groups of people and claim this cancels the other requirements to give. 
But this isn't so, just because you pay your sales tax, doesn't excuse you from paying your income tax.

The one thing a false Christian can never do is give away their material possessions. When a Fake Christian is asked to decide between their obedience to Christ and their love of material possessions, material possessions win every time.

I know lots of you are saying "Hey, this guy is doing a scam". 
But a scam requires a deception a trick. Whereas I am being 100% honest. I'm not selling anything, I'm not promising anything. There is nothing in this for them at all other than to see if they are willing to follow the words of Jesus Christ even when those words start to get a little uncomfortable and inconvenient. 

They may also discover what's more important to them, Their material possessions or their salvation through Jesus Christ. Clearly, if they choose the material possessions, it's a damn good indicator they don't actually believe in any eternal salvation.

Jesus said in Luke 6:30 "Give to everyone that asketh thee"... I am asking.... 

Eric and Sye like to make the accusation that you can be wrong about everything you know. Clearly this is not so, I know for a fact that Eric and Sye will always chose their material possessions in favour of their commitment to Jesus Christ.

I know for sure they will either fail to respond or start making excuses and quoting out of context scriptures. 

If they do put their money where their mouth is they will have proved me wrong, I'll even go to church every Sunday for a year.
If they chose to ignore the instructions of Jesus Christ and spit in his face, they will have proved me right. 

Therefore by their fruits shall you know them.

Sye is probably not a wealth man so I'm only asking him for $25,000

Note:- This challenge is based on my $1000 True Christian Challenge first posted in 2001 and is still open to any self proclaimed Christian.

Let the excuses begin.....

Friday, 17 August 2012

Skepticule Extra Podcast #30


Skepticule Extra Podcast #30




Play Now
The Skepticule Extra Podcast #30 is out NOW.Featuring a Deconstruction of the Debate by Dr. Hugh Ross and Prof. Lewis Wolpert - (Is there a case for a cosmic creator). Exposing the deliberate dishonesty of Creationists.  
Also,  a day out at Bletchley Park to celebrate Alan Turing's Birthday.

SkepExtra-030-20120701
Skepticule Extra shownotes for episode 030 20120701

This is the thirtieth episode of Skepticule Extra — otherwise known as the podcast of the Pauline Triad.

Paul Baird
Patient and Persistent
http://patientandpersistent.blogspot.com

Paul Thompson ("Sinbad") 
The Skeptical Probe
http://skepticalprobe.blogspot.com/

Paul S. Jenkins
Notes from an Evil Burnee
http://www.evilburnee.co.uk






    Send feedback to feedback@skepticule.co.uk, write a review oniTunes or post a comment below. There is also a Skepticule Extra Forum for further discussion of topics covered in the show (plus other topics). Follow the link to try out the forum. Skepticule Extra is a production of Willowsoft CommunicationsCreative Commons License Skepticule Extra is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License
    Direct download:http://traffic.libsyn.com/revup/SkepExtra-030-20120701.mp3

    Sunday, 22 July 2012

    The Magnificent Temple of Solomon


    Solomon's Temple was a magnificent structure.

    The Bible tells us that Solomon employed 30,000 people to build the temple in 3 shifts of 10,000 at a time. There was a staggering 80,000 people quarrying stone to build the temple. Yet another 70,000 people were employed just to transport the stone from the quarry to the building site. Solomon employed another 3,300 supervisors to oversee the work. That's a total of 183,300 people working for 7 years.. yes 7 years to build the magnificent temple of Solomon.


    The temple was about 9 meters wide (10 yards).... Just a minute... that's smaller than my house. It was 27 meters long (30 yards) ... Err... That's a little bigger than my house, but smaller if I include the garage. 

    The rooms in the ground floor of the surrounding annexe building were 2.2 meters wide, that's barely enough room to lie down. You could fit a king sized bed in there but there would be no room to get out of the side of the bed.



    The front porch was only about 4.5 meters long, so its not quite long enough to keep my BMW in the shade.



    So, it took 183,000 men 7 years to build a temple less than half the size of your average McDonalds. Exactly what were 80,000 people doing in the quarry for 7 years? Perhaps they had really bad union problems. Perhaps Solomon, his project managers and the supervisors (all 3,300 of them) were just utterly incompetent. Perhaps it's not true. Perhaps the Bible writers just made the whole thing up without paying any attention to the practical reality of what they were writing?


    The Bible tells us of the supplies used by this massive workforce. The total volume of all the olive oil consumed by the workers is more than twice the total volume of the temple they were building.

    If you assume the olive oil was stored in rounded pots and the pots were piled up in one place, They would be over 4 times the size of the temple.

    Perhaps, if they had built the Temple from the empty olive oil pots it would have been a far more impressive building and taken 20 men about a week to build?

    If we assume the 30,000 construction workers on the actual construction site were split into 3 shifts of 10,000. If we then assume that we squash all those workers onto the site shoulder to shoulder with only enough room to sit touching another worker on all 4 sides with no spaces for paths to move stone or go to the toilet, that gives us a square of about 2 ft for each of the 10,000 workers on each shift. The workers would have to be placed in 100 rows of 100 workers which occupies a square of 200 ft by 200 ft.

    We know that the inner temple was only about 35ft wide. Even if you include all the side chambers, the 10,000 workers could not physically fit onto the site while sitting side by side with no spaces. If you then start to account for the space for the 70,000 men transporting stone, all the supervisors and of course the space for the building they were constructing for 7 years, the absurdity becomes apparent.

    Now to go on to the shift workers cutting wood in Lebanon:-
    10,000 men working for 313 days a year (Sabbath off). Lets suppose one man cuts down and prepares only one tree a day. that's 3,130,000 trees a year for 7 years which is about 22 million trees to build something the size of a McDonnalds????



    It gets more absurd. If you get four 6x6 beams 20 feet long from a single cedar tree. The total number of beams laid end to end would stretch for 333 thousand miles. that's 14 times around the earth.
    If you used only the Cedar beams to build the temple as per the stated dimensions it would be 700 miles high.


    The bible states exactly how small the Temple was. The magnificent Solomon's Temple was smaller that the smallest church I have ever been in.


    Most of you ladies here will know what was going on here. When a self absorbed guy claims it's huge, When you get to see it, the reality is that its usually disappointingly small. 

    Sunday, 15 July 2012

    Pareidolia and Tricks of the Mind

    This is an aerial view of a geological feature to the east of Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada known as the Badlands Guardian. It clearly resembles a human head possibly wearing some form of traditional head dress.
    The feature that resembles ear-buds is a service road leading to a small oil well.

    Incidentally, The feature is actually concaved, (it is an erosion valley), however, it  looks convex because our brain instantly recognise a configuration that closely resembles a human face. The pattern matching ability of our brain is converting this random geological feature into a face, makes it look convex and calls upon cultural references to give us the perception it is listening to an iPod.



    This picture is a bust of the Mayan King Pacal. Compare this with the image above.


    If Erich von Däniken had seen these two images together, he would have had a cow.

    Our ability to recognise patterns and to cross reference them to things that are familiar to us is a fundamental function of the brain. All animals that can see also make sense of the world around them by pattern matching.

    The brain isn't perfect and often makes mistakes. It often mis-interprets visual cues and gives us false positives. This explains why a child sees monsters and ghosts in their bedroom when the light has been turned out and the moon is casing unfamiliar shadows. The brain goes into overdrive trying to make sense of what it sees... and the brain is excellent at recognising faces in random imagery.



    The people in this picture are mostly Catholic and their brains have been fooled into seeing an image of the Virgin Mary in the interference pattern caused by the anti-UV film on this office window in Clearwater Florida.


    They have linked the pattern they see in the window to the very strong cultural reference of their belief in the Virgin Mary as depicted in orthodox religious art. 


    The connection is so strong that they can not differentiate between reality and optical illusion. To them, this is a real supernatural event, Mary is somehow present and many have come to worship her.


    Likewise, Christians can easily recognise a Pareidolia image of Jesus Christ in this dog's butt.

    Had this image been manifest in a waterfall or a Butterfly wing, no doubt Christians would be flocking to worship it, However, the cultural significance of a dog's asshole is enough to override the cultural significance of an apparent image of Jesus Christ and they will recognise it for what it is, a trick of the mind.





    Cultural references and familiar imagery plays a key role in how our brain matches the image we see to how we interpret that image.

    In the image below, almost all adults will immediately see two lovers but to a young child, they will only see dolphins. In fact an adult will need to look carefully just to see the dolphins.



    Saturday, 16 June 2012

    Breaking the Law for God


    While shopping today in High Wycombe, I was handed this leaflet:-


    By these people:


    Their claim is that:  If you suffer from Cancer or indeed any illness, you are invited to sit down in one of their chairs and allow God to heal you... while they pray.

    The Cancer Act 1939 states:-

    "No person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement containing an offer to treat any person for cancer, or to prescribe any remedy therefor, or to give any advice in connection with the treatment thereof".

    If any person contravenes any of the provisions they shall be liable on summary conviction to a term of imprisonment not exceeding 3 months.

    The Cancer Act of 1939 defines the possible legal defences for persons charged with contravening the Act. The Persons charged must prove they are:-
    • Members of either House of Parliament or of a local authority or of a governing body of a voluntary hospital.
    • Registered medical practitioners;
    • Registered nurses;
    • Registered pharmacists and persons lawfully conducting a retail pharmacy business in accordance with section 69 of the Medicines Act 1968
    • Persons undergoing training with a view to becoming registered medical practitioners, registered nurses or registered pharmacists

    or that:
    • the said advertisement was published only in a publication of a technical character intended for circulation mainly amongst persons of the classes mentioned in the last preceding paragraph or one of some of those classes.

    The Act states:
    "it shall be the duty of the council of every county and county borough to institute proceedings under this section".

    the expression “advertisement” includes any notice, circular, label, wrapper or other document, and any announcement made orally or by any means of producing or transmitting sounds".



    Clearly this religious group are simply using the desire for a cure for Cancer or any other illness as a marketing tool to promote, evangelise and proselytise their own brand of religion.

    They are offering this service in a busy shopping centre less than half a mile from a busy hospital full of ill people. Surely if their intent was to heal the ill, they would be providing this service in the hospital where people suffering from Cancer would be only too pleased to have a same-day cure.

    However, they choose to provide this service to healthy Saturday shoppers who's illness seems to be that they have a God shaped hole in their hearts.   

    I may need to have a word with the ASA, the local Council and maybe Hayley Stevens. Oh yes... as the Law of the Land is being broken, maybe the police....

    Ref:-




    Monday, 4 June 2012

    Skepticule Extra Podcast #27


    SkepExtra-027-20120520

    Skepticule Extra shownotes for episode 027 20120520

    This is the twenty-seventh episode of Skepticule Extra — otherwise known as the triPPPle Paul podcast.

    Paul Baird
    Patient and Persistent
    http://patientandpersistent.blogspot.com

    Paul Thompson ("Sinbad") 
    The Skeptical Probe
    http://skepticalprobe.blogspot.com/

    Paul S. Jenkins
    Notes from an Evil Burnee
    http://www.evilburnee.co.uk


    Many thanks to James Croft for being our guest for this episode


      Send feedback to feedback@skepticule.co.uk, write a review oniTunes or post a comment below. There is also a Skepticule Extra Forum for further discussion of topics covered in the show (plus other topics). Follow the link to try out the forum.
      Skepticule Extra is a production of Willowsoft Communications

      Creative Commons License
      Skepticule Extra is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.

      Direct download:
      http://traffic.libsyn.com/revup/SkepExtra-027-20120520.mp3

      Sunday, 29 April 2012

      Halal meat production - Brutal or humane?



      This post is in response: to "The Big Questions". (Series 5 Episode 15) screened on BBC 1 on 29th April 2012 presented by Nicky Campbell.

      The topic being debated was "Should halal and kosher meat be labelled?"

      The argument presented by the pro halal guests was that there is no need to label halal slaughtered meat products because halal slaughter is more humane than the slaughter of a stunned animal.

      Watch this video and decide for yourself.


      The video is extremely graphic. Don't say I didn't warn you.

      The first few seconds shows a standard animal slaughter.
      The rest of the video shows how Muslims insist their animals are slaughtered.



      Fast Food Chains in the UK sell Halal meat without any indication it is Halal.
      • Domino's Pizza:- Most of their Chicken is Halal
      • Pizza Hut: - Some Chicken is Halal
      • KFC:- Some Chicken is Halal (Excludes Halal only branches)
      • Nando's:- A Small amout of Chicken is Halal in all branches (Excludes Halal only branches)
      • SubWays:- Less than 5% Halal - Not Stunned (Excludes Halal only branches)
      • MacDonalds, Burger King and Wimpey:- Do not sell Halal food in the UK

      Supermarkets in the UK are selling Halal meat without any indication it is Halal.
      • Tesco:- All New Zealand Lamb is Halal - 35% of UK Lamb is Halal
      • Waitrose:-All Lamb is Halal -
      • M&S:-All New Zealand Lamb is Halal -
      • Sainsbury:-All New Zealand Lamb is Halal -
      • Asda (Wal-Mart):- Refused to Comment
      • Somerfield:-All New Zealand Lamb is Halal -
      • The Co-op:-All New Zealand Lamb is Halal -
      The Food industry is selling us Halal Slaughtered meat and are not telling us it is Halal or what a Halal Slaughter is.

      Muslims tell us Halal Slaughter is much more humane than the way the west slaughter animals.
      You decide.

      This is done in the name of Religion.

      References:
      Daily Mail - News article:


      Friday, 13 April 2012

      Armageddon May 27th - Oh No, Not again!


      Yet another "End of the World" Prophet enters the crazy world of Christian prophecy.

      Harold Camping has hardly faded from memory and yet another Prophet of the End Times has already stepped up to the plate to tell us when we are all going to be destroyed by God. Ronald Weinland from the Church of God has been chosen by God himself to tell the world we are going to be destroyed on MAY 27th 2012.

      This isn't some arbitrary calculation based on a selection of numbers found in the text of the Bible, NO. This is a direct Revelation from God to Ron.

      You See, When God dictated the Book of Revelations to John, John didn't understand what all this Acid-Trip-Imagery actually meant. Luckily for us, God has told Ron what it all means and has tasked Ron with a mission to tell the rest of humanity.

      This does beg the question why God would choose a man with no credibility whatsoever to deliver the most important message ever to be given to the human race.

      The most important message ever to be delivered to the human race is available for free download in PDF or Kindle format from Ron's website at  http://www.the-end.com/Download_Free_Book.asp

      It's difficult to figure out Ron's motives, he's giving his publications away for FREE and there is a complete absence of a 'Donate' button on any of his sites. It couldn't possibly be for publicity because when Ron's... er.. sorry God's prophesy fails to materialise it will turn Ron into a target of ridicule and label him as a False Prophet.

      Ron has given some radio interviews and he sounds sincere, lucid, sober and he doesn't have a southern accent.

      Perhaps, just maybe he genuinely believes he's received instructions from God.


      Here's the sequence of events according to Ron..
      The prophecies revealed in this book explain the demise of the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, and much of western Europe, which will be followed by man's final world war. This last war will be the result of clashing religions and the governments they sway. Billions will die! The destruction of this time will far exceed the very worst times of all human history.
      As these events unfold, the world will increasingly become aware of the authenticity of the words in this book and realize that Ronald Weinland has been sent by God as His end-time prophet.

      Hmm... not very specific. In fact there is a huge amount of wiggle room here. What will actually happen on May 27th? Could the world financial markets collapse, World War III start and conclude with the destruction of mankind all on a Sunday afternoon or is it going to take a little time to ramp up to full blown Armageddon. Ron says it will ramp up 2 to 3 weeks before the 27th with terrible destruction and Christ will return on the 27th.

      Presumably, when nothing much happens Ron will claim one of the following:

      • The events have been initiated and will become apparent... soon.
      • The events all happened invisibly it the spirit realm.
      • Ron convinced God through intense prayer to give mankind a second chance.
      • He misunderstood some important factor and it will now be in 3 months time.
      • I got it wrong.

      He does make some additional weird statements:-

      • He believes the British are not British, they are all Jewish or descendants of one of the tribes of Israel.
      • The Germans (Bad Guys) are descendants of the Assyrians and along with China and Russia will be the instigators of nuculer (yes nuculer) war.
      • Americans, Canadians and Australians are all descended from the Tribes of Israel and God migrated those Tribes from Israel to their current locations.

      I would suggest that if Ron doesn't understand what happened in the past, he may not be best qualified to inform us about the future.

      But then again.... He could be right.

      I wonder if Ron would consider entering into a legal contract to sign over all of his assets to me on May 28th 2012, after all he won't be needing material possessions by then. I wonder what he values most, his faith in God or his material possessions.

      Ron's End Times Website:-
      http://www.the-end.com

      WCEM Radio Interview with Ron
      http://www.cog-pkg.org/audio/download/interviews/2012-01-11_WCEM_Interview.mp3



      Tuesday, 10 April 2012

      Skepticule Extra Podcast #23





      The Skepticule Extra Podcast #23 is out now.
      SkepExtra-023-20120325
      Skepticule Extra shownotes for episode 023 20120325

      This is the twenty-third episode of Skepticule Extra (or the paultrio podcast).


      Paul Baird
      Patient and Persistent
      http://patientandpersistent.blogspot.com

      Paul Thompson ("Sinbad") 

      The Skeptical Probe
      http://skepticalprobe.blogspot.com/


      Paul S. Jenkins
      Notes from an Evil Burnee
      http://www.evilburnee.co.uk

















          Send feedback to feedback@skepticule.co.uk, write a review oniTunes or post a comment below. There is also a Skepticule Extra Forum for further discussion of topics covered in the show (plus other topics). Follow the link to try out the forum.
          Skepticule Extra is a production of Willowsoft Communications


          Creative Commons License
          Skepticule Extra is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.


          Direct download:
          http://traffic.libsyn.com/revup/SkepExtra-023-20120325.mp3